{"id":1432,"date":"2013-09-18T10:43:37","date_gmt":"2013-09-18T00:43:37","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/theveterinarian.com.au\/?p=1432"},"modified":"2013-09-02T10:47:26","modified_gmt":"2013-09-02T00:47:26","slug":"research-reveals-loophole-in-whipping-rules","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/theveterinarian.com.au\/?p=1432","title":{"rendered":"Research reveals loophole in whipping rules"},"content":{"rendered":"&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<a href=\"https:\/\/theveterinarian.com.au\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/08\/Fig-1-b.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignleft  wp-image-1434\" style=\"border: 1px solid black; margin: 2px;\" alt=\"Fig 1 b\" src=\"https:\/\/theveterinarian.com.au\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/08\/Fig-1-b-300x227.jpg\" width=\"270\" height=\"204\" srcset=\"https:\/\/theveterinarian.com.au\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/08\/Fig-1-b-300x227.jpg 300w, https:\/\/theveterinarian.com.au\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/08\/Fig-1-b-150x113.jpg 150w, https:\/\/theveterinarian.com.au\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/08\/Fig-1-b-400x302.jpg 400w, https:\/\/theveterinarian.com.au\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/08\/Fig-1-b.jpg 786w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 270px) 100vw, 270px\" \/><\/a>A Sydney University study has exposed a loophole in whipping rules which may inadvertently encourage jockeys to use a whip in a way that causes more harm.\r\n\r\nThe study, published in the<em> Journal of Veterinary Behavior<\/em>, analysed both forehand and backhand whipstrikes of jockeys in Victoria.\r\n\r\nUnder the Australian Racing Board\u2019s Rules of Racing, jockeys are limited in using forehand whip strikes. Forehand whipstrikes may not be delivered in consecutive strides nor on more than five occasions before the final 100 metres. However, backhand strikes are permitted without reservation \u2013 as long as the horse is in contention.\r\n\r\nAccording to the paper, \u201cthis seems to imply that backhand whip use is less closely scrutinised, which may have profound implications for horse welfare.\u201d\r\n\r\nLead investigatory Professor Paul McGreevy said that approximately 70 per cent of whip use is backhand \u2013 and thus immune to limitations under the 2009 ARB rules.\r\n\r\nA previous study by the same team found that whip strikes caused a visible indentation in 83 per cent of impacts, and the unpadded section of the whip made contact with the horse in 64 per cent of cases.\r\n\r\n<!--more-->\r\n\r\nIn the current study, jockeys struck a pressure-detection pad on a static model-horse, using both left and right hands and forehand and backhand whip strikes to facilitate comparison of force.\r\n\r\nWhen jockeys used their non-dominant hand, whipping technique did not influence the force of impact. However, when the dominant hand was used, the jockeys struck with more force when using the backhand technique.\r\n\r\nFurthermore, it found that there was marked variation in force of the whipstrike between individual jockeys.\r\n\r\n\u201cThis highlights the problems the industry has in trying to enforce equity in whip use to satisfy punters while at the same time giving reassurances about horse welfare,\u201d McGreevy said. \u201cIt shows that whipping is extremely difficult to regulate. The industry can\u2019t really assure punters or animal advocates that a whip strike is a whip strike is a whip strike.\u201d\r\n\r\nHe hoped that the findings would inform a review around the rules of whip use to avoid unjustified focus on either forehand or backhand whip use.\r\n\r\n\u201cThe take-home message is that this is another piece of peer-reviewed evidence that indicates how difficult it is to justify whipping tired horses in the name of sport,\u201d he said.\r\n\r\nRacing NSW Chief Steward Ray Murrihy said that since the 2009 rules were introduced many jockeys had undertaken to participate in an education program \u201cto further reduce the amount of whip use.\u201d\r\n\r\n\u201cAt the last meeting the stewards around the country were happy with progress of the program,\u201d he said. \u201cThe jury is still well and truly out about whether backhand [strikes] are more forceful, that seems to go against logic.\u201d\r\n\r\nThe ARB had engaged in its own research program, in conjunction with Charles Sturt University, to evaluate the impact of whips. ARB secretary Peter McGauran was unavailable to comment, although it is understood that the results are expected in the near future.\r\n\r\nAccording to the AVA\u2019s policy on the Use of Horse Whips in Racing, \u201cexcessive or incorrect use of a whip on any horse, including the whipping of horses unable to improve their position in a race field, is not condoned.\u201d\r\n\r\nAVA President Ben Gardiner said that presentations by McGreevy and McGauran to the Policy Advisory Council (PAC) had \u201ccertainly raised a lot of issues,\u201d however a consensus about whether and how such findings impact the policy was not reached.\r\n\r\nWhether the rules government the use of whips in racing is itself a welfare issue, and whether existing use is sufficiently regulated, is an issue being considered by a designated working party of the PAC.\r\n\r\n<strong>ANNE FAWCETT<\/strong>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>&nbsp; A Sydney University study has exposed a loophole in whipping rules which may inadvertently encourage jockeys to use a whip in a way that causes more harm. The study, published in the Journal of Veterinary Behavior, analysed both forehand and backhand whipstrikes of jockeys in Victoria. Under the Australian Racing Board\u2019s Rules of Racing, [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[679,1276,1278,838,347,1275,1277],"class_list":["post-1432","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news","tag-horseracing","tag-journal-of-veterinary-behavior","tag-paul-mcgreevy","tag-sydney-university","tag-victoria","tag-whipping","tag-whipstrikes"],"rise-blocks_total_comments":0,"rise-blocks_categories":[{"term_id":5,"name":"News","slug":"news","term_group":0,"term_taxonomy_id":5,"taxonomy":"category","description":"","parent":0,"count":402,"filter":"raw","cat_ID":5,"category_count":402,"category_description":"","cat_name":"News","category_nicename":"news","category_parent":0}],"rise-blocks_excerpt":"&nbsp; A Sydney University study has exposed a loophole in whipping rules which may inadvertently encourage jockeys to use a whip in a way that causes more harm. The study, published in the Journal of Veterinary Behavior, analysed both forehand and backhand whipstrikes of jockeys in Victoria. Under the Australian Racing Board\u2019s Rules of Racing, jockeys are limited in using..","blog_post_layout_featured_media_urls":{"thumbnail":"","full":""},"categories_names":{"5":{"name":"News","link":"https:\/\/theveterinarian.com.au\/?cat=5"}},"tags_names":{"679":{"name":"horseracing","link":"https:\/\/theveterinarian.com.au\/?tag=horseracing"},"1276":{"name":"Journal of Veterinary Behavior","link":"https:\/\/theveterinarian.com.au\/?tag=journal-of-veterinary-behavior"},"1278":{"name":"Paul McGreevy","link":"https:\/\/theveterinarian.com.au\/?tag=paul-mcgreevy"},"838":{"name":"Sydney University","link":"https:\/\/theveterinarian.com.au\/?tag=sydney-university"},"347":{"name":"Victoria","link":"https:\/\/theveterinarian.com.au\/?tag=victoria"},"1275":{"name":"whipping","link":"https:\/\/theveterinarian.com.au\/?tag=whipping"},"1277":{"name":"whipstrikes","link":"https:\/\/theveterinarian.com.au\/?tag=whipstrikes"}},"comments_number":"0","wpmagazine_modules_lite_featured_media_urls":{"thumbnail":"","cvmm-medium":"","cvmm-medium-plus":"","cvmm-portrait":"","cvmm-medium-square":"","cvmm-large":"","cvmm-small":"","full":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/theveterinarian.com.au\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1432","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/theveterinarian.com.au\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/theveterinarian.com.au\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/theveterinarian.com.au\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/theveterinarian.com.au\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1432"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/theveterinarian.com.au\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1432\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1463,"href":"https:\/\/theveterinarian.com.au\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1432\/revisions\/1463"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/theveterinarian.com.au\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1432"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/theveterinarian.com.au\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1432"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/theveterinarian.com.au\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1432"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}